Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(12): 1727-1732, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1497806

ABSTRACT

Biorepositories provide a critical resource for gaining knowledge of emerging infectious diseases and offer a mechanism to rapidly respond to outbreaks; the emergence of the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, has proved their importance. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the absence of centralized, national biorepository efforts meant that the onus fell on individual institutions to establish sample repositories. As a safety-net hospital, Boston Medical Center (BMC) recognized the importance of creating a COVID-19 biorepository to both support critical science at BMC and ensure representation in research for its urban patient population, most of whom are from underserved communities. This article offers a realistic overview of the authors' experience in establishing this biorepository at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic during the height of the first surge of cases in Boston, Massachusetts, with the hope that the challenges and solutions described are useful to other institutions. Going forward, funders, policymakers, and infectious disease and public health communities must support biorepository implementation as an essential element of future pandemic preparedness.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , COVID-19/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Pandemics , Specimen Handling , Boston , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Safety-net Providers , Urban Population
2.
STAR Protoc ; 1(2): 100102, 2020 09 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-759461

ABSTRACT

The protocols herein outline the use of qRT-PCR to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA in patient samples. In order to cope with potential fluctuations in supply chain and testing demands and to enable expedient adaptation of reagents and assays on hand, we include details for three parallel methodologies (one- and two-step singleplex and one-step multiplex assays). The diagnostic platforms described can be easily adapted by basic science research laboratories for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing with relatively short turnaround time. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Vanuytsel et al. (2020).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Disease Notification/methods , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Software
3.
Med (N Y) ; 1(1): 152-157.e3, 2020 12 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-728768

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Significant delays in the rapid development and distribution of diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection have prevented adequate public health management of the disease, impacting the timely mapping of viral spread and the conservation of personal protective equipment. Furthermore, vulnerable populations, such as those served by the Boston Medical Center (BMC), the largest safety net hospital in New England, represent a high-risk group across multiple dimensions, including a higher prevalence of pre-existing conditions and substance use disorders, lower health maintenance, unstable housing, and a propensity for rapid community spread, highlighting the urgent need for expedient and reliable in-house testing. METHODS: We developed a SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic medium-throughput qRT-PCR assay with rapid turnaround time and utilized this Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified assay for testing nasopharyngeal swab samples from BMC patients, with emergency authorization from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. FINDINGS: The in-house testing platform displayed robust accuracy and reliability in validation studies and reduced institutional sample turnaround time from 5-7 days to less than 24 h. Of over 1,000 unique patient samples tested, 44.1% were positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides a blueprint for academic centers and community hospitals lacking automated laboratory machinery to implement rapid in-house testing. FUNDING: This study was supported by funding from the Boston University School of Medicine, the National Institutes of Health, Boston Medical Center, and the Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness (MASS CPR).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnosis , Humans , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reproducibility of Results , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Safety-net Providers , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL